This article introduces an integrative RIH framework drawing on the RRI literature, the international literature on health systems as well as specific bodies of knowledge that shed light on key dimensions of health innovations.

Silva, H.P., Lehoux, P., Miller, F.A., Denis, J.-L. (2018). Introducing responsible innovation in health: a policy-oriented framework, Health Research Policy and Systems. 

Drawing on a prospective public deliberation study, this article offers sociological insights into the ways in which members of the public reason around assistive actions, be they performed by humans, machines or both.

Lehoux, P., Grimard, D. (2018). When robots care: Public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults, Social Science & Medicine.

Response to three comments on the article « Providing value to new health technology: the early contribution of entrepreneurs, investors, and regulatory agencies» (Lehoux P., Miller F., Daudelin G, Denis J., 2017).

Lehoux, P., Miller, F.A., Daudelin, G., Denis, J.-L. (2018). Why learning how to chase butterflies matters: A response to recent commentaries, International Journal of Health Policy and Management.

This article looks at what kind of research was conducted on Health System challenges, where it was performed, in which health sectors and on which populations. It also identifies the types of challenge that were most present and how they varied across countries

Roncarolo, F., Boivin, A., Denis, J.-L., Hébert, R., Lehoux, P. (2017). What do we know about the needs and challenges of health systems? A scoping review of the international literature, BMC Health Services Research.

This article examines how members of the public conceive of the relationship between responsibility and prospective health technologies.

Lehoux, P., Miller, F.A., Grimard, D., Gauthier, P. (2017). Anticipating health innovations in 2030–2040: Where does responsibility lie for the publics? Public Understanding of Science.

This article examines the rules that characterize economic policy, capital investment, and regulatory approval as well as the way these institutions enable and constrain the development of ventures at an early stage.

Lehoux, P., Daudelin, G., Denis, J.-L., Miller F.A. (2017). A Concurrent Analysis of Three Institutions that Transform Health Technology-Based Ventures: Economic Policy, Capital Investment, and Market Approval, Review of Policy Research.

This paper examines how members of the public define the legitimacy of cognitive and behavioural enhancement.

Lehoux, P., Williams-Jones, B., Grimard, D., Proulx, S. (2017). Technologies of the self in public health: insights from public deliberations on cognitive and behavioural enhancement, Critical Public Health.

Lehoux, P., Cheriet, I., Grimard, D. (2017). Que pense le public de la prévention dans le contexte de la médecine prédictive? Éthique, Médecine et Politique Publique.

Building on insights from sociology of expectations and institutions, this paper elicits how specific institutional requirements provide potency to the expectations that pave the health technology development pathway.

Lehoux, P., Miller, F.A., Daudelin, G. (2016). Converting clinical risks into economic value: The role of expectations and institutions in health technology development, Technological Forcasting and Social Change.

This study explored interactions with device industry representatives among physicians who use implantable cardiovascular and orthopedic devices to identify whether conflict of interest (COI) is a concern and how it is managed.

Gagliardi, A., Lehoux, P., Ducey, A., Easty, A., Ross, S., Bell, C., Trbovich, P., Urbach, D. (2017). We can’t get along without each other: Qualitative interviews with physicians about device industry representatives, conflict of interest and patient safety, PLoS ONE.