This article analyzes how procurement organizations assess the value of medical technologies: how products are solic- ited and evaluated, who is buying, and how buying practices structure opportunities for suppliers.
Miller, F.A., Lehoux, P., Peacock, S., Rac, V.E., Neukomm, J., Barg, C., Bytautas, J., Krahn, M. (2019). How procurement judges the value of medical technologies: A review of healthcare tenders, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.
To generate an empirically-grounded model of why and how responsible innovations are produced, this paper provides a synthesis of 17 qualitative studies describing the development of responsible innovations that have an incidence on the determinants of health.
Lehoux, P., Daudelin, G., Denis, J.-L., Gauthier, P., Hagemeister, N. (2019). Pourquoi et comment sont conçues des innovations responsables? Résultats d’une méta-ethnographie, Revue d’économie et de management de l’innovation.
To identify the challenges that responsible innovation in health should seek to address, this papers presents the findings of a synthesis of 254 articles that examined the challenges of health systems in 99 countries.
Lehoux, P., Roncarolo, F., Silva, H.P., Boivin, A., Denis, J.-L., Hébert, R. (2019). What health system challenges should responsible innovation in health address? Insights from an international scoping review, International Journal of Health Policy and Management.
This paper shows how an international panel of experts contributed to the development of a Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) screening and assessment Tool.
Silva, H.P., Lehoux, P., Hagemeister, N. (2018). Developing a tool to assess responsibility in health innovation: Results from an international delphi study, Health Policy and Technology.
With the help of empirical examples, this paper explores the relationships Responsible Innovation in Health (RIH) may entertain with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).
Lehoux, P., Pacifico H.P., Pozelli Sabio, R., Roncarolo, F. (2018). The Unexplored Contribution of Responsible Innovation in Health to Sustainable Development Goals, Sustainability.
This article introduces an integrative RIH framework drawing on the RRI literature, the international literature on health systems as well as specific bodies of knowledge that shed light on key dimensions of health innovations.
Silva, H.P., Lehoux, P., Miller, F.A., Denis, J.-L. (2018). Introducing responsible innovation in health: a policy-oriented framework, Health Research Policy and Systems.
Drawing on a prospective public deliberation study, this article offers sociological insights into the ways in which members of the public reason around assistive actions, be they performed by humans, machines or both.
Lehoux, P., Grimard, D. (2018). When robots care: Public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults, Social Science & Medicine.
Response to three comments on the article « Providing value to new health technology: the early contribution of entrepreneurs, investors, and regulatory agencies» (Lehoux P., Miller F., Daudelin G, Denis J., 2017).
Lehoux, P., Miller, F.A., Daudelin, G., Denis, J.-L. (2018). Why learning how to chase butterflies matters: A response to recent commentaries, International Journal of Health Policy and Management.
This article looks at what kind of research was conducted on Health System challenges, where it was performed, in which health sectors and on which populations. It also identifies the types of challenge that were most present and how they varied across countries
Roncarolo, F., Boivin, A., Denis, J.-L., Hébert, R., Lehoux, P. (2017). What do we know about the needs and challenges of health systems? A scoping review of the international literature, BMC Health Services Research.
This article examines how members of the public conceive of the relationship between responsibility and prospective health technologies.
Lehoux, P., Miller, F.A., Grimard, D., Gauthier, P. (2017). Anticipating health innovations in 2030–2040: Where does responsibility lie for the publics? Public Understanding of Science.