This paper examines how members of the public define the legitimacy of cognitive and behavioural enhancement.
Lehoux, P., Williams-Jones, B., Grimard, D., Proulx, S. (2017). Technologies of the self in public health: insights from public deliberations on cognitive and behavioural enhancement, Critical Public Health.
This study uses structuring theory to explore how members of the public anticipate the potential and limitations of prevention in the context of predictive medicine and to clarify the underlying reasoning processes.
Lehoux, P., Cheriet, I., Grimard, D. (2017). Que pense le public de la prévention dans le contexte de la médecine prédictive? Éthique, Médecine et Politique Publique.
Building on insights from sociology of expectations and institutions, this paper elicits how specific institutional requirements provide potency to the expectations that pave the health technology development pathway.
Lehoux, P., Miller, F.A., Daudelin, G. (2016). Converting clinical risks into economic value: The role of expectations and institutions in health technology development, Technological Forcasting and Social Change.
This study explored interactions with device industry representatives among physicians who use implantable cardiovascular and orthopedic devices to identify whether conflict of interest (COI) is a concern and how it is managed.
Gagliardi, A., Lehoux, P., Ducey, A., Easty, A., Ross, S., Bell, C., Trbovich, P., Urbach, D. (2017). We can’t get along without each other: Qualitative interviews with physicians about device industry representatives, conflict of interest and patient safety, PLoS ONE.
This study identified that patients are not engaged in discussions or decisions about implantable medical devices.
Gagliardi, A. R., Lehoux, P., Ducey, A., Easty, A., Ross, S., Bell, C. M., & Urbach, D. R. (2017). Factors constraining patient engagement in implantable medical device discussions and decisions: Interviews with physicians, International Journal for Quality in Health Care.
This chapter provides readers with clear guidance on the ways in which particular qualitative methods can help HTA practitioners to elicit patients’ perspectives, experiences and preferences.
Lehoux, P., Jimenez-Pernett, J., (2017). Making sense of patients’ perspectives, experiences and preferences in HTA (pp.215-224). In Facey, K., Hensen, H.P., Single, A.N.V. (Eds). Patient Involvement in Health Technology Assessment (HTA). Singapore: Springer.
The goal of this paper is to clarify how entrepreneurs, investors, and regulatory agencies influence the value of emerging health technologies.
Lehoux, P., Miller, F.A., Daudelin, G., Denis, J.L. (2017). Providing value to new health technology: the early contribution of entrepreneurs, investors, and regulatory agencies, International Journal of Health Policy and Management.
This article seeks to deepen our understanding of the responsible research and innovation (RRI) approach as it relates to health care systems, where the notion of responsibility is already deeply embedded.
Demers-Payette, O., Lehoux, P., Daudelin, G. (2016). Responsible research and innovation: a productive model for the future of medical innovation, Journal of Responsible Innovation.
This article aims to generate a better understanding of the historical Research & Development dynamics that have contributed to shape today’s medical innovation ecosystem.
Lehoux, P., Roncarolo, F., Rocha Oliveira, R., Silva, H.P. (2016). Medical innovation and the sustainability of health systems: A historical perspective on technological change in health, Health Services Management Research.
This article looks at a prospective method using multimedia material for public deliberations on health technology design.
Lehoux, P., Jimenez-Pernett, J., Miller, F. A., Williams-Jones, B. (2016). Assessment of a multimedia-based prospective method to support public deliberations on health technology design: participant survey findings and qualitative insights, BMC Health Services Research.