Comment inviting scholars to further the discussion on how the value of health innovations should be appraised in view of today’s societal challenges.

Lehoux, P., Silva, H.P. (2020). Transforming Disciplinary Traditions; Comment on “Problems and Promises of Health Technologies: The Role of Early Health Economic Modeling”, International Journal of Health Policy and Management.

This article examines how improving the quality of work and well-being of health care providers could help rethinking the implementation of EHRs and also other information technology-based tools and systems, while creating more value for patients, organizations and health systems.

Alami, H., Lehoux, P., Gagnon, MP., Fortin, JP., Fleet, R., Ag Ahmed MA. (2020). Rethinking the electronic health record through the quadruple aim: time to align its value with the health system, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

This article generate methodological insights into the way prospective public deliberative processes can stimulate the public’s moral imagination regarding what may (or may not) happen in the future and what should (or should not) happen in the future.

Lehoux, P., Miller, F.A., Williams-Jones, B. (2020). Anticipatory governance and moral imagination: Methodological insights from a scenario-based public deliberation study, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

Responses to comments on our scoping review that identified the challenges that responsible innovation in health should seek to address.

Lehoux, P., Roncarolo, F., Silva, H.P., Boivin, A., Denis, J.-L., Hébert, R. (2020). Revisiting the relationship between systems of innovation and health systems: A response to recent commentaries, International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 

This essay aims to clarify why alternative food systems supported by a different Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) approach can contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG).

Pozelli Sabio, R., Lehoux, P. (2019). How can alternative food systems contribute to the sustainable development goals?, Systèmes alimentaires/Food Systems.

This paper explores how those who design new health technologies (devices, technical aids and information technologies) perceive and address environmental considerations in their practice.

Rivard, L., Lehoux, P., Miller, F.A. (2019). Double burden or single duty to care? Health innovators’ perspectives on environmental considerations in health innovation design, BMJ Innovation.

This paper examines how two complementary perspectives —as a public representative or a health services user— entail different yet mutually challenging ways of appraising health innovations. Policymakers should foster the expression of both personal and collective perspectives.

Lehoux, P. & Proulx S. (2019) Deliberating as a public representative or as a potential user? Two complementary perspectives that should inform health innovation policy, Healthcare Policy.

By analyzing the practical insights of health innovators on what is and is not responsible innovation in health, this paper demonstrates how they consider both the desirability and feasibility of responsibility features when contemplating their operationalization.

Rivard L., Lehoux P. (2019). When desirability and feasibility go hand in hand: innovators’ perspectives on what is and is not responsible innovation in health, Journal of Responsible Innovation.

This essay clarifies why alternative food systems supported by a different Science, Technology & Innovation approach could contribute to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). These systems are analyzed through the SDGs framework and illustrated with three examples from Québec (Canada), which show how the consolidation of alternative food systems may foster the changes required by the SDGs.

Pozelli Sabio, R., & Lehoux, P. (2019). How can alternative food systems contribute to the sustainable development goals? Systèmes alimentaires/Food systems, 2019(4), 209-218.

This article analyzes how procurement organizations assess the value of medical technologies: how products are solic- ited and evaluated, who is buying, and how buying practices structure opportunities for suppliers.

Miller, F.A., Lehoux, P., Peacock, S., Rac, V.E., Neukomm, J., Barg, C., Bytautas, J., Krahn, M. (2019). How procurement judges the value of medical technologies: A review of healthcare tenders, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.